• "...an
unalloyed pleasure." The New York Times
• "...some of the most educated,
agile and subtle fingers in the business. If ever a recital
warranted a capacity audience, it was this." The West
Australian • "...keen
intelligence, finely poised restraint, and beautiful tone." Buckinghamshire
Examiner • "At a time when
pianists are extremely thick on the ground, Graham FItch
gave me satisfaction which comes all
too infrequently." Berkshire Countryside • "His sensitive playing of the
concerto [Mozart K491] immediately impressed me. Phrases
had wonderful shape, and deep musicality: a pianist of integrity
and profundity." Die Burger • "Fitch's style is marked by a
breezy, laid-back presentation, impeccable keyboard technique,
a deep knowledge of the musicological facts and a truly
phenomenal musical memory." Toowoomba Chronicle • "This was playing of stature
and great sensitivity." Dame Fanny Waterman
|
|

• KEYBOARD WIZARDRY FROM FITCH
Recital -
Graham FItch, piano,
Octagon Theatre
The West Australian, Monday July 5 1999
Review by Neville Cohn
To negotiate Bach’s monumental Goldberg Variations, one
of music’s most hazardous obstacle courses, and emerge
with honour reasonably intact is no small achievement. To come
through the ordeal without compromising the sanctity of the
printed note - and banners triumphantly flying - is rarer still.
Like
some musical Caesar, Cape Town-based Graham Fitch came to Perth,
played and conquered.
With the worldwide swing towards authentic
performance practice, opportunities of hearing Bach’s
masterpiece on the piano (as opposed to the harpsichord, for
which it was
intended) are
few - especially by a pianist who is clearly a master of the
instrument.
There is nothing in the least showy about Fitch’s
stage manner; it borders on the austere. And in performance,
there
is not a hint of pretentiousness, of playing to the gallery.
On the contrary, Fitch addressed the work with the utmost seriousness
of purpose. No fudging here, no resorting to the damper pedal
to cover technical weaknesses; there were none, anyway.
As a feat
of memory, this was a remarkable effort with, at one point,
only the briefest weakening of concentration over a timespan
of well over an hour, Fitch’s playing, moreover, sounded
as fresh and authoritative at the end of this marathon as in
the earliest of the 30 variations. It left one wondering anew
at the incomparable richness of the music, fashioned from the
most modest of bases; a little sarabande Bach tossed off years
earlier for the delectation of his second wife, and a prosaic,
borrowed folk tune about cabbages.
Throughout, Fitch, employing
some of the most educated, agile and subtle fingers in the
business, gave us an account that brimmed
with felicities.
Invariably, Fitch’s choice of tempi sounded
entirely right, taking the first of the variations, for instance,
at a good,
sturdy pace, as appropriate as that set for variation five
(an excruciatingly difficult essay involving crossing hands)
with
its buoyancy of momentum and springy rhythms.
And in variation
12, digital wizardry was brought to bear on contrapuntal lines
that, in Fitch’s hands, coalesced and
separated in a way that appeared simplicity itself.
It isn’t, of course; it’s
villainously difficult. But at no time was one conscious of
even the slightest strain
on the part of the pianist.
Perhaps it is only those who have
endeavoured to breathe life into these unforgivingly difficult
measures who can fully appreciate
Fitch’s achievement.
In variation 13 for instance, he did
wonders in essaying note patterns that were, in their way,
as intricate and beautiful
as finest Brussels lace. The fluttering trills in variation
28, too, were presented with as much authority as a simulation
of
bold drumbeats in the episode that followed.
Elsewhere, Fitch
was entirely persuasive in moments during which he produced
sound patterns of such delicate, fragile quality
that they reached the ears as if filtered through layers of
fine gauze.
What a shame there were such big islands of empty seats
at the Octagon. If ever a recital warranted a capacity audience,
it
was this.
|